Getfit, MIT Health’s winter exercise challenge, turns 20 in 2024

Getfit, MIT Health’s winter exercise challenge, turns 20 in 2024

Getfit” isn’t a command, but rather a friendly challenge from MIT Health (formerly MIT Medical) to spend the cold months exercising with a group of people you choose in any way you choose. This year, the popular winter fitness program is celebrating its 20th year. What began as a goal-oriented exercise incentive for MIT Health staff in its pilot year, and expanded in 2005 to the entire MIT community, has now become a cherished tradition for many.

Tom Goodwin, a staff member in MIT Health who has participated every year, states the program’s value succinctly. “Getfit starts when it is cold and dark and ends when it is warm and bright. Forming a team and logging minutes motivates us to get off the couch and move!”

Andrea Porras, a Media Lab affiliate and four-time participant, says, “I look forward to getfit every year because it’s the only thing motivating me to make an extra step in the winter. It’s a fun way to learn more about your co-worker and the sporty activities they participate in. You’d never know who’s into boxing or hockey!”

The getfit challenge continued even during the Covid-19 pandemic, providing an important means of connecting with others during a time of social distancing. It has grown steadily from 1,277 participants in 2005 to 3,385 participants on 501 teams in 2023, logging a total of 12,890,676 exercise minutes. That’s 214,845 hours — or an average of 63.5 hours for each participant — over the three-month period.

Almost any kind of exercise can be counted — walking across campus, climbing stairs, running or swimming, skiing, stretching, even time spent lifting heavy items. Any exercise that gets your heart beating faster than usual, uses your muscles, or increases your flexibility can help to fulfill your weekly exercise-minutes goal and add to your team’s combined minutes, which need to be entered into the getfit website by the following Monday.

Teams of five to eight people can include staff, students, faculty, affiliates, and family members with two co-captains. Each team strives to meet the weekly exercise goals for individuals and teams, starting with 150 minutes in the first week and building up to 300 minutes in week 12. Some team members may complete more minutes than others, at varying degrees of exercise intensity. But as long as each individual meets getfit’s minimum weekly goal, they qualify for that week’s prize drawing for individuals, and teams whose per-member average meets or exceeds the goal are entered in the drawing for weekly team prizes.

“We have been doing the getfit challenge for 17 years and loving it,” says a spokesperson for the MIT Sloan EverReadys, a seven-member team with five faculty members, one affiliate, and one family member. “It gets us going in the middle of winter and continues to motivate us for the whole 12 weeks. Some of us can get over 300 minutes each of the weeks; others barely make the required amount. Nonetheless, there have been a number of times when we had a perfect season, each person making the required amount in each of the 12 weeks. We also think we are probably the oldest gang in town. Our ages range from the 50s to the 90s. ‘Not bad,’ we like to think.”

A grand prize for one randomly drawn team is awarded at the end of the three months. At the end of the challenge, “Onward and Upward” prizes are awarded by random drawing to two individuals who recorded exercise minutes for every week of the challenge and demonstrated a steady and consistent increase in exercise minutes from week to week, even if those minutes didn’t meet each weekly goal set by getfit. This year there will be even more prizes, in celebration of the program’s 20th anniversary.

In addition to the chance to win prizes, all participants on an active team can receive a free getfit T-shirt — a special 20th anniversary version this year — and can take advantage of other free or discounted services, such as a special four-month access pass to MIT Recreation and a free 30-day membership on the exercise app CardioCast.

But for many people, bonding with teammates is a more powerful incentive than winning prizes.

“For me, the social aspect was most useful,” says Josh Bradshaw, the family member of a graduate student. “Seeing my friends getting out there and pushing up their scores was a helpful nudge to do a little bit more myself … After taking up running during getfit, I ramped up my weekly volume and eventually ran the Philadelphia Marathon in the fall.”

The program often helps create new exercise momentum for people, such as Shellyann Isaac, from the Undergraduate Advising Center, who will be a 20-year participant this year. She began the program trying not to disappoint her teammates, but over the years, she says, “I worked out to not disappoint myself.”

“Getfit is my annual reminder to check in on my health, both mental and physical,” says Brian Bryson of MIT Technology Review. “It’s a great reflection point that sets the tone for the rest of the year.”

Registration for getfit 2024 runs through Jan. 23. The challenge begins Monday, Jan. 29 and ends Sunday, April 21. More information can be found at getfit.mit.edu.

Google announces UK data centre to meet ‘growing demand’ for AI

Google has announced plans to invest $1 billion in a new data centre in the UK which it says will help to meet “growing demand” for its AI and cloud services. The 33-acre site in Waltham Cross, Hertfordshire will bring much-needed compute capacity to businesses, supporting…

Meta Invests Heavily in AI Future with Nvidia Chips

In an ambitious move signaling a major strategic shift, Meta is diving deep into the realm of artificial intelligence. At the core of this venture is a massive investment in Nvidia’s cutting-edge computer chips, integral to AI research and development. Mark Zuckerberg, the CEO of Meta,…

Blueprint Labs launches a charter school research collaborative

Blueprint Labs launches a charter school research collaborative

Over the past 30 years, charter schools have emerged as a prominent yet debated public school option. According to the National Center for Education Statistics, 7 percent of U.S. public school students were enrolled in charter schools in 2021, up from 4 percent in 2010. Amid this expansion, families and policymakers want to know more about charter school performance and its systemic impacts. While researchers have evaluated charter schools’ short-term effects on student outcomes, significant knowledge gaps still exist. 

MIT Blueprint Labs aims to fill those gaps through its Charter School Research Collaborative, an initiative that brings together practitioners, policymakers, researchers, and funders to make research on charter schools more actionable, rigorous, and efficient. The collaborative aims to create infrastructure to streamline and fund high-quality, policy-relevant charter research. 

Joshua Angrist, MIT Ford Professor of Economics and a Blueprint Labs co-founder and director, says that Blueprint Labs hopes “to increase [its] impact by working with a larger group of academic and practitioner partners.” A nonpartisan research lab, Blueprint Labs aims to produce the most rigorous evidence possible to inform policy and practice. Angrist notes, “The debate over charter schools is not always fact-driven. Our goal at the lab is to bring convincing evidence into these discussions.”

Collaborative kickoff

The collaborative launched with a two-day kickoff in November. Blueprint Labs welcomed researchers, practitioners, funders, and policymakers to MIT to lay the groundwork for the collaborative. Over 80 participants joined the event, including leaders of charter school organizations, researchers at top universities and institutes, and policymakers and advocates from a variety of organizations and education agencies. 

Through a series of panels, presentations, and conversations, participants including Rhode Island Department of Education Commissioner Angélica Infante-Green, CEO of Noble Schools Constance Jones, former Knowledge is Power Program CEO Richard Barth, president and CEO of National Association of Charter School Authorizers Karega Rausch, and many others discussed critical topics in the charter school space. These conversations influenced the collaborative’s research agenda. 

Several sessions also highlighted how to ensure that the research process includes diverse voices to generate actionable evidence. Panelists noted that researchers should be aware of the demands placed on practitioners and should carefully consider community contexts. In addition, collaborators should treat each other as equal partners. 

Parag Pathak, the Class of 1922 Professor of Economics at MIT and a Blueprint Labs co-founder and director, explained the kickoff’s aims. “One of our goals today is to begin to forge connections between [attendees]. We hope that [their] conversations are the launching point for future collaborations,” he stated. Pathak also shared the next steps for the collaborative: “Beginning next year, we’ll start investing in new research using the agenda [developed at this event] as our guide. We will also support new partnerships between researchers and practitioners.”

Research agenda

The discussions at the kickoff informed the collaborative’s research agenda. A recent paper summarizing existing lottery-based research on charter school effectiveness by Sarah Cohodes, an associate professor of public policy at the University of Michigan, and Susha Roy, an associate policy researcher at the RAND Corp., also guides the agenda. Their review finds that in randomized evaluations, many charter schools increase students’ academic achievement. However, researchers have not yet studied charter schools’ impacts on long-term, behavioral, or health outcomes in depth, and rigorous, lottery-based research is currently limited to a handful of urban centers. 

The current research agenda focuses on seven topics:

  • the long-term effects of charter schools;
  • the effect of charters on non-test score outcomes;
  • which charter school practices have the largest effect on performance;
  • how charter performance varies across different contexts;
  • how charter school effects vary with demographic characteristics and student background;
  • how charter schools impact non-student outcomes, like teacher retention; and
  • how system-level factors, such as authorizing practices, impact charter school performance.

As diverse stakeholders’ priorities continue to shift and the collaborative progresses, the research agenda will continue to evolve.

Information for interested partners

Opportunities exist for charter leaders, policymakers, researchers, and funders to engage with the collaborative. Stakeholders can apply for funding, help shape the research agenda, and develop new research partnerships. A competitive funding process will open this month.

Those interested in receiving updates on the collaborative can fill out this form. Please direct questions to chartercollab@mitblueprintlabs.org.