MIT Energy and Climate Club mobilizes future leaders to address global climate issues

One of MIT’s missions is helping to solve the world’s greatest problems — with a large focus on one of the most pressing topics facing the world today, climate change.The MIT Energy and Climate Club, (MITEC) formerly known as the MIT Energy Club, has been working since 2004 to inform and educate the entire MIT community about this urgent issue and other related matters.

MITEC, one of the largest clubs on campus, has hundreds of active members from every major, including both undergraduate and graduate students. With a broad reach across the Institute, MITEC is the hub for thought leadership and relationship-building across campus.

The club’s co-presidents Laurențiu Anton, doctoral candidate in electrical engineering and computer science; Rosie Keller, an MBA student in the MIT Sloan School of Management; and Thomas Lee, doctoral candidate in the Institute for Data, Systems, and Society, say that faculty, staff, and alumni are also welcome to join and interact with the continuously growing club.

While they closely collaborate on all aspects of the club, each of the co-presidents has a focus area to support the student managing directors and vice presidents for several of the club’s committees. Keller oversees the External Relations, Social, Launchpad, and Energy and Climate Hackathon leadership teams. Lee supports the leadership team for next spring’s Energy Conference. He also assists the club treasurer on budget and finance and guides the industry Sponsorships team. Anton oversees marketing, community and education as well as the Energy and Climate Night and Energy and Climate Career Fair leadership teams.

“We think of MITEC as the umbrella of all things related to energy and climate on campus. Our goal is to share actionable information and not just have discussions. We work with other organizations on campus, including the MIT Environmental Solutions Initiative, to bring awareness,” says Anton. “Our Community and Education team is currently working with the MIT ESI [Environmental Solutions Initiative] to create an ecosystem map that we’re excited to produce for the MIT community.”

To share their knowledge and get more people interested in solving climate and energy problems, each year MITEC hosts a variety of events including the MIT Energy and Climate Night, the MIT Energy and Climate Hack, the MIT Energy and Climate Career Fair, and the MIT Energy Conference to be held next spring March 3-4. The club also offers students the opportunity to gain valuable work experience while engaging with top companies, such as Constellation Energy and GE Vernova, on real climate and energy issues through their Launchpad Program.

Founded in 2006, the annual MIT Energy Conference is the largest student-run conference in North America focused on energy and climate issues, where hundreds of participants gather every year with the CEOs, policymakers, investors, and scholars at the forefront of the global energy transition.

“The 2025 MIT Energy Conference’s theme is ‘Breakthrough to Deployment: Driving Climate Innovation to Market’ — which focuses on the importance of both cutting-edge research innovation as well as large-scale commercial deployment to successfully reach climate goals,” says Lee.

Anton notes that the first of four MITEC flagship events the MIT Energy and Climate Night. This research symposium that takes place every year in the fall at the MIT Museum will be held on Nov. 8. The club invites a select number of keynote speakers and several dozen student posters. Guests are allowed to walk around and engage with students, and in return students get practice showcasing their research. The club’s career fair will take place in the spring semester, shortly after Independent Activities Period.

MITEC also provides members opportunities to meet with companies that are working to improve the energy sector, which helps to slow down, as well as adapt to, the effects of climate change.

“We recently went to Provincetown and toured Eversource’s battery energy storage facility. This helped open doors for club members,” says Keller. “The Provincetown battery helps address grid reliability problems after extreme storms on Cape Cod — which speaks to energy’s connection to both the mitigation and adaptation aspects of climate change,” adds Lee.

“MITEC is also a great way to meet other students at MIT that you might not otherwise have a chance to,” says Keller.

“We’d always welcome more undergraduate students to join MITEC. There are lots of leadership opportunities within the club for them to take advantage of and build their resumes. We also have good and growing collaboration between different centers on campus such as the Sloan Sustainability Initiative and the MIT Energy Initiative. They support us with resources, introductions, and help amplify what we’re doing. But students are the drivers of the club and set the agendas,” says Lee.

All three co-presidents are excited to hear that MIT President Sally Kornbluth wants to bring climate change solutions to the next level, and that she recently launched The Climate Project at MIT to kick off the Institute’s major new effort to accelerate and scale up climate change solutions.

“We look forward to connecting with the new directors of the Climate Project at MIT and Interim Vice President for Climate Change Richard Lester in the near future. We are eager to explore how MITEC can support and collaborate with the Climate Project at MIT,” says Anton.

Lee, Keller, and Anton want MITEC to continue fostering solutions to climate issues. They emphasized that while individual actions like bringing your own thermos, using public transportation, or recycling are necessary, there’s a bigger picture to consider. They encourage the MIT community to think critically about the infrastructure and extensive supply chains behind the products everyone uses daily.

“It’s not just about bringing a thermos; it’s also understanding the life cycle of that thermos, from production to disposal, and how our everyday choices are interconnected with global climate impacts,” says Anton.

“Everyone should get involved with this worldwide problem. We’d like to see more people think about how they can use their careers for change. To think how they can navigate the type of role they can play — whether it’s in finance or on the technical side. I think exploring what that looks like as a career is also a really interesting way of thinking about how to get involved with the problem,” says Keller.

“MITEC’s newsletter reaches more than 4,000 people. We’re grateful that so many people are interested in energy and climate change,” says Anton.

The changing geography of “energy poverty”

A growing portion of Americans who are struggling to pay for their household energy live in the South and Southwest, reflecting a climate-driven shift away from heating needs and toward air conditioning use, an MIT study finds.

The newly published research also reveals that a major U.S. federal program that provides energy subsidies to households, by assigning block grants to states, does not yet fully match these recent trends.

The work evaluates the “energy burden” on households, which reflects the percentage of income needed to pay for energy necessities, from 2015 to 2020. Households with an energy burden greater than 6 percent of income are considered to be in “energy poverty.” With climate change, rising temperatures are expected to add financial stress in the South, where air conditioning is increasingly needed. Meanwhile, milder winters are expected to reduce heating costs in some colder regions.

“From 2015 to 2020, there is an increase in burden generally, and you do also see this southern shift,” says Christopher Knittel, an MIT energy economist and co-author of a new paper detailing the study’s results. About federal aid, he adds, “When you compare the distribution of the energy burden to where the money is going, it’s not aligned too well.”

The paper, “U.S. federal resource allocations are inconsistent with concentrations of energy poverty,” is published today in Science Advances.

The authors are Carlos Batlle, a professor at Comillas University in Spain and a senior lecturer with the MIT Energy Initiative; Peter Heller SM ’24, a recent graduate of the MIT Technology and Policy Program; Knittel, the George P. Shultz Professor at the MIT Sloan School of Management and associate dean for climate and sustainability at MIT; and Tim Schittekatte, a senior lecturer at MIT Sloan.

A scorching decade

The study, which grew out of graduate research that Heller conducted at MIT, deploys a machine-learning estimation technique that the scholars applied to U.S. energy use data.

Specifically, the researchers took a sample of about 20,000 households from the U.S. Energy Information Administration’s Residential Energy Consumption Survey, which includes a wide variety of demographic characteristics about residents, along with building-type and geographic information. Then, using the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey data for 2015 and 2020, the research team estimated the average household energy burden for every census tract in the lower 48 states — 73,057 in 2015, and 84,414 in 2020.

That allowed the researchers to chart the changes in energy burden in recent years, including the shift toward a greater energy burden in southern states. In 2015, Maine, Mississippi, Arkansas, Vermont, and Alabama were the five states (ranked in descending order) with the highest energy burden across census bureau tracts. In 2020, that had shifted somewhat, with Maine and Vermont dropping on the list and southern states increasingly having a larger energy burden. That year, the top five states in descending order were Mississippi, Arkansas, Alabama, West Virginia, and Maine.

The data also reflect a urban-rural shift. In 2015, 23 percent of the census tracts where the average household is living in energy poverty were urban. That figure shrank to 14 percent by 2020.

All told, the data are consistent with the picture of a warming world, in which milder winters in the North, Northwest, and Mountain West require less heating fuel, while more extreme summer temperatures in the South require more air conditioning.

“Who’s going to be harmed most from climate change?” asks Knittel. “In the U.S., not surprisingly, it’s going to be the southern part of the U.S. And our study is confirming that, but also suggesting it’s the southern part of the U.S that’s least able to respond. If you’re already burdened, the burden’s growing.”

An evolution for LIHEAP?

In addition to identifying the shift in energy needs during the last decade, the study also illuminates a longer-term change in U.S. household energy needs, dating back to the 1980s. The researchers compared the present-day geography of U.S. energy burden to the help currently provided by the federal Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP), which dates to 1981.

Federal aid for energy needs actually predates LIHEAP, but the current program was introduced in 1981, then updated in 1984 to include cooling needs such as air conditioning. When the formula was updated in 1984, two “hold harmless” clauses were also adopted, guaranteeing states a minimum amount of funding.

Still, LIHEAP’s parameters also predate the rise of temperatures over the last 40 years, and the current study shows that, compared to the current landscape of energy poverty, LIHEAP distributes relatively less of its funding to southern and southwestern states.

“The way Congress uses formulas set in the 1980s keeps funding distributions nearly the same as it was in the 1980s,” Heller observes. “Our paper illustrates the shift in need that has occurred over the decades since then.”

Currently, it would take a fourfold increase in LIHEAP to ensure that no U.S. household experiences energy poverty. But the researchers tested out a new funding design, which would help the worst-off households first, nationally, ensuring that no household would have an energy burden of greater than 20.3 percent.

“We think that’s probably the most equitable way to allocate the money, and by doing that, you now have a different amount of money that should go to each state, so that no one state is worse off than the others,” Knittel says.

And while the new distribution concept would require a certain amount of subsidy reallocation among states, it would be with the goal of helping all households avoid a certain level of energy poverty, across the country, at a time of changing climate, warming weather, and shifting energy needs in the U.S.

“We can optimize where we spend the money, and that optimization approach is an important thing to think about,” Knittel says. 

NAB NY Preview: What’s New in Video Production & Broadcasting – Videoguys

On this week’s Videoguys Live, James is giving a sneak peak into NAB New York and letting you know where all of our partners can be found and what they will be showing off on the show floor. Tune in to learn more and we hope to see you on the show floor October 9 & 10!

[embedded content]


Check Out the Broadfield Pavilion at NAB NY in Booth #711

YoloLiv in Broadfield Pavilion Booth #711

  • First time ever showing off the new YoloBox Extreme in the United States

YoloBox Extreme, with 8 HDMI inputs + 2 Configurable HDMI Outputs, 4K, NDI, Enhanced MultiCam Replay, and much easier automatic Video Follows Audio and much easier almost anything else that’s all configured and operated from YoloBox itself, with no computer required at all.

Atomos in Broadfield Pavilion Booth #711

  • Showing off Shinobi II, Ninja Phone, Shogun Classic, Sun Dragon, Sumo 19 and more! 

BirdDog in Broadfield Pavilion Booth #711

  • Showcasing the brand new X-Series range
  • X5 Ultra
  • X4 Ultra
  • X1 & X1 Ultra
  • Maki Ultra
  • And more coming soon!

PTZOptics in Broadfield Pavilion Booth #711

  • MOVE 4K PTZ Cameras
  • ZCAM 4K – Box camera
  • Hive Studio

JVC in Broadfield Pavilion Booth #711

  •  Showing off their new PTZ cameras, controllers, and vMix Production Systems

LiveU in Broadfield Pavilion Booth #711

  • Showing off LU300S, LU800, Lightweight Production Bundles, and more!

Canon in Broadfield Pavilion Booth #711

  • See Canons line of Camcorders and PTZ cameras that support Wide Dynamic Range!

Vizrt in Broadfield Pavilion Booth #711

  • One of the first TriCaster Vizion demos in the US
  • Tricaster Mini S – NEW Tricaster software
  • Connect Tetra – Swiss-army knife of an AV edge-device
  • PTZ3 UHDPlus – 4K auto-tracking
  • Flex Dual Control Panel
  • Virtual Studio Go

Kiloview in Broadfield Pavilion Booth #711

  • Come and see the P3, P3 mini, encoders, decoders, converters, and more!

Avid in Broadfield Pavilion Booth #711

  • Avid Media Composer, Media Centra,l and Nexis 

Matrox in Broadfield Pavilion Booth #711

  • Encoding/decoding for REMI, contribution, and transport
  • ST 2110/IPMX-ready baseband converters and encoders/decoders
  • Advanced 4K IP-to-IP video gateway for media conversion, processing, and routing
  • High-performance 4K IP KVM extension over standard 1 GbE networks.

Absen in Broadfield Pavilion Booth #711

  • Polaris V2 Series
  • NX Series  

Check Out Our Partners Booths @ NAB NY

NETGEAR AVNAB NY Booth #1252

  • M4250 Managed Switches​: The AV Line of M4250 switches are built for 1G AV over IP installations and designed for a clean integration with traditional rack-mounted AV equipment.
  • M4350 Managed Switches​: The M4350 Series of 1 Gigabit to 100 Gigabit fully managed switches provides an edge to core stackable platform for any AV over IP installation. Redundant modular power supplies on select models contribute to business continuity management.​
  • Engage Controller​: On-board, configure, and monitor multiple M4250, M4300, and M4350 switches used in AV networks. Use the AV GUI to quickly and reliably configure for any AV over IP installation.​
  • ​​Pro WiFi Access Points​: Get powerful and reliable wireless connectivity for all your devices, even in high-density environments. Remote management via NETGEAR Insight, along with simplified enterprise-grade security built-in for peace of mind

Panasonic Connect – NAB NY Booth #611

  • KAIROS live production platform demos
  • First Look at NEW UB50 and UB10 cameras

SanDisk Professional​ – NAB NY Booth #628

G-RAID MIRROR
Set to RAID 1 (Mirroring) will allow you to keep a working copy of your valuable content on one drive and will automatically create a duplicate for you on the second drive for data redundancy and peace of mind.

G-DRIVE PROJECT
Transfer, edit, and archive large volumes of high-value content daily. The workflow is fast and simple, so you can focus on the content, and have peace of mind about your storage.

Facilis – NAB NY Booth #910

  • FASTCache Remote Workflow Accelerator, now available with Version 8.3, to be demoed at NAB Show New York 2024.
  • New FastTracker MAM Features and Enhanced HUB AD/LDAP Support.

2024: More CSS At-Rules Than the Past Decade Combined

More times than I can count, while writing, I get myself into random but interesting topics with little relation to the original post. In the end, I have to make the simple but painful choice of deleting or archiving hours …

2024: More CSS At-Rules Than the…

Ameesh Divatia, Co-founder & CEO of Baffle – Interview Series

Ameesh Divatia is the co-founder & CEO of Baffle, a company focused on integrating data security into every aspect of the data pipeline to simplify cloud data protection and minimize the impact of data breaches. Its platform offers a no-code, easy-to-deploy solution that secures sensitive data…

How to Manage Your Website’s Technical Debt – Speckyboy

The web seems to move at the speed of light. The tools and best practices we use today will soon be outdated. It’s a vicious cycle we repeat again and again.

That often leaves us with some form of technical debt. It could be a WordPress theme that isn’t compatible with the latest version of PHP. Or a hacked-together layout that won’t adapt to future needs. The worst case is software that is no longer supported.

It will impact every website sooner or later. There are ways to manage or even prevent it, though.

So, how do you keep technical debt from becoming a nightmare? Let’s review a few tips for minimizing the impact.


Build with Sustainability in Mind

The first step is to reduce the chances for technical debt to take hold. In practice, it’s about building with sustainability in mind.

There are several things you can do. For one, use tools that are popular and well-maintained. It’s not a guarantee of smooth sailing. It does increase the chances of future viability, though.

Let’s use WordPress as an example. The content management system (CMS) has existed for over 20 years. It is continually updated. A large ecosystem of themes and plugins is also thriving.

Perhaps there’s another CMS that catches your eye. It hit the market only recently – there aren’t many users yet.

There’s nothing wrong with this new CMS. But is it sustainable? Only time will tell. Therefore, it may not be the best long-term solution. Using it comes with some level of risk.

Best practices also guard against technical debt. Use the latest standards when writing code. Don’t rely on CSS hacks to build layouts. Comment your code and take detailed notes.

The idea is to think about the present and future. That could save you some headaches down the road.

A sustainable approach can reduce technical debt.

Perform Regular Audits of Your Website

The status of your stack can change in an instant. Thus, it’s a good idea to perform regular audits.

A website audit should cover both hardware and software. On the hardware side, make sure your web hosting is still viable. Check your site’s performance and resource usage. The results should tell you if you need to upgrade.

You’ll also want to look closely at the software you’re using. Start with the server’s OS. Move on to versions of PHP, MySQL, or whatever you have in place. These items are crucial to your site’s well-being.

From there, it’s time to look at your CMS, themes, and plugins. Also, review any software dependencies – JavaScript libraries are a good example.

Look for outdated items. Are updates available? Is it still actively maintained?

This process will help you identify potential problems. From there, you can take action.

So, how often should you audit your site? A yearly review is fine for small websites. Large and mission-critical sites would benefit from biannual or quarterly inspections.

Performing an audit can help you identify potential issues before they impact your website.

Use Change as an Opportunity

Perhaps you found an item or two that needs addressing. That’s OK – change is inevitable!

The good news is that change also presents an opportunity. You can reassess how your website is working. There is a chance to build a more stable foundation for the future.

In some cases, you may have to swap one item for another. For example, maybe a WordPress plugin you use has been abandoned.

Now is the time to find a replacement that will offer better longevity. It’s also possible that you no longer need what the old plugin offers. That’s one way to reduce technical debt.

You might also need to modernize your code. We often do this when dealing with PHP compatibility issues.

It’s not only a chance to use the latest version of PHP. You can also look for ways to improve functionality and security. After all, reviewing the code you wrote years ago can show how far you’ve come. There’s a chance to build it better and stronger.

You can do more than bring your website up to date. You can also make forward-thinking changes. The hope is that you can lessen the technical debt you have today – and for the future.

Addressing technical debt is an opportunity to reduce future issues.

Take Control of Your Site’s Technical Debt

Every website will deal with technical debt. That’s part of its lifecycle.

The difference is in how much debt you’ll face. Critical thinking early in the site-building process can reduce your burden. To that end, always search for the most stable and functional solution.

Changes will come eventually. That’s an opportunity to recalibrate your approach. You can review what works and what doesn’t. The lessons you learn will come in handy as your site evolves.

The key is to think about each step you take. Consider how it will impact your site today, tomorrow, and a year from now.

You probably won’t eliminate the need for change. However, you can learn how to make change more manageable.

Related Topics


Top

The risks behind the generative AI craze: Why caution is growing

In the near future, Silicon Valley might look back at recent events as the point where the generative AI craze went too far. This past summer, investors questioned whether top AI stocks could sustain their sky-high valuations, given the lack of returns on massive AI spending….

Institute Professor Emeritus John Little, a founder of operations research and marketing science, dies at 96

MIT Institute Professor Emeritus John D.C. Little ’48, PhD ’55, an inventive scholar whose work significantly influenced operations research and marketing, died on Sept. 27, at age 96. Having entered MIT as an undergraduate in 1945, he was part of the Institute community over a span of nearly 80 years and served as a faculty member at the MIT Sloan School of Management since 1962.

Little’s career was characterized by innovative computing work, an interdisciplinary and expansive research agenda, and research that was both theoretically robust and useful in practical terms for business managers. Little had a strong commitment to supporting and mentoring others at the Institute, and played a key role in helping shape the professional societies in his fields, such as the Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS).

He may be best known for his formulation of “Little’s Law,” a concept applied in operations research that generalizes the dynamics of queuing. Broadly, the theorem, expressed as L = λW, states that the number of customers or others waiting in a line equals their arrival rate multiplied by their average time spent in the system. This result can be applied to many systems, from manufacturing to health care to customer service, and helps quantify and fix business bottlenecks, among other things.

Little is widely considered to have been instrumental in the development of both operations research and marketing science, where he also made a range of advances, starting in the 1960s. Drawing on innovations in computer modeling, he analyzed a broad range of issues in marketing, from customer behavior and brand loyalty to firm-level decisions, often about advertising deployment strategy. Little’s research methods evolved to incorporate the new streams of data that information technology increasingly made available, such as the purchasing information obtained from barcodes.

“John Little was a mentor and friend to so many of us at MIT and beyond,” says Georgia Perakis, the interim John C. Head III Dean of MIT Sloan. “He was also a pioneer — as the first doctoral student in the field of operations research, as the founder of the Marketing Group at MIT Sloan, and with his research, including Little’s Law, published in 1961. Many of us at MIT Sloan are lucky to have followed in John’s footsteps, learning from his research and his leadership both at the school and in many professional organizations, including the INFORMS society where he served as its first president. I am grateful to have known and learned from John myself.”

Little’s longtime colleagues in the marketing group at MIT Sloan shared those sentiments.

“John was truly an academic giant with pioneering work in queuing, optimization, decision sciences, and marketing science,” says Stephen Graves, the Abraham J. Siegel Professor Post Tenure of Management at MIT Sloan. “He also was an exceptional academic leader, being very influential in the shaping and strengthening of the professional societies for operations research and for marketing science. And he was a remarkable person as a mentor and colleague, always caring, thoughtful, wise, and with a New England sense of humor.”

John Dutton Conant Little was born in Boston and grew up in Andover, Massachusetts. At MIT he majored in physics and edited the campus’ humor magazine. Working at General Electric after graduation, he met his future wife, Elizabeth Alden PhD ’54; they both became doctoral students in physics at MIT, starting in 1951.

Alden studied ferroelectric materials, which exhibit complex properties of polarization, and produced a thesis titled, “The Dynamic Behavior of Domain Walls in Barium Titanate,” working with Professor Arthur R. von Hippel. Little, advised by Professor Philip Morse, used MIT’s famous Whirlwind I computer for his dissertation work. His thesis, titled “Use of Storage Water in a Hydroelectric System,” modeled the optimally low-cost approach to distributing water held by dams. It was a thesis in both physics and operations research, and appears to be the first one ever granted in operations research.

Little then served in the U.S. Army and spent five years on the faculty at what is now Case Western Reserve University, before returning to the Institute in 1962 as an associate professor of operations research and management at MIT Sloan. Having worked at the leading edge of using computing to tackle operations problems, Little began applying computer modeling to marketing questions. His research included models of consumer choice and promotional spending, among other topics.

Little published several dozen scholarly papers across operations research and marketing, as well as co-editing, along with Robert C. Blattberg and Rashi Glazer, a 1974 book, “The Marketing Information Revolution,” published by Harvard Business School Press. Ever the wide-ranging scholar, he even published several studies about optimizing traffic signals and traffic flow.

Still, in addition to Little’s Law, some of his key work came from studies in marketing and management. In an influential 1970 paper in Management Science,  Little outlined the specifications that a good data-driven management model should have, emphasizing that business leaders should be given tools they could thoroughly grasp.

In a 1979 paper in Operations Research, Little described the elements needed to develop a robust model of ad expenditures for businesses, such as the geographic distribution of spending, and a firm’s spending over time. And in a 1983 paper with Peter Guadagni, published in Marketing Science, Little used the advent of scanner data for consumer goods to build a powerful model of consumer behavior and brand loyalty, which has remained influential.

Separate though these topics might be, Little always sought to explain the dynamics at work in each case. As a scholar, he “had the vision to perceive marketing as source of interesting and relevant unexplored opportunities for OR [operations research] and management science,” wrote Little’s MIT colleagues John Hauser and Glen Urban in a biographical chapter about him, “Profile of John D.C. Little,” for the book “Profiles in Operations Research,” published in 2011. It it, Hauser and Urban detail the lasting contributions these papers and others made.

By 1967, Little had co-founded the firm Management Decisions Systems, which modeled marketing problems for major companies and was later purchased by Information Resources, Inc. on whose board Little served.

In 1989, Little was named Institute Professor, MIT’s highest faculty honor. He had previously served as director of the MIT Operations Research Center. At MIT Sloan he was the former head of the Management Science Area and the Behavioral and Policy Sciences Area.

For all his productivity as a scholar, Little also served as a valued mentor to many, while opening his family home outside of Boston to overseas-based faculty and students for annual Thanksgiving dinners. He also took pride in encouraging women to enter management and academia. In just one example, he was the principal faculty advisor for the late Asha Seth Kapadia SM ’65, one of the first international and female students at Sloan, who studied queuing theory and later became a longtime professor at the University of Texas School of Public Health.

Additionally, current MIT Sloan professor Juanjuan Zhang credits Little for inspiring her interest in the field; today Zhang is the John D.C. Little Professor of Marketing at MIT Sloan.

“John was a larger-than-life person,” Zhang says. “His foundational work transformed marketing from art, to art, science, and engineering, making it a process that ordinary people can follow to succeed. He democratized marketing.”

Little’s presence as an innovative, interdisciplinary scholar who also encouraged others to pursue their own work is fundamental to the way he is remembered at MIT.

“John pioneered in operations research at MIT and is widely known for Little’s Law, but he did even more work in marketing science,” said Urban, an emeritus dean of MIT Sloan and the David Austin Professor in Marketing, Emeritus. “He founded the field of operations research modeling in marketing, with analytic work on adaptive advertising, and did fundamental work on marketing response. He was true to our MIT philosophy of “mens et manus” [“mind and hand”] as he proposed that models should be usable by managers as well as being theoretically strong. Personally, John hired me as an assistant professor in 1966 and supported my work in the following 55 years at MIT. I am grateful to him, and sad to lose a friend and mentor.”

Hauser, the Kirin Professor of Marketing at MIT Sloan, added: “John made seminal contributions to many fields from operations to management science to founding marketing science. More importantly, he was a unique colleague who mentored countless faculty and students and who, by example, led with integrity and wit. I, and many others, owe our love of operations research and marketing science to John.”

In recognition of his scholarship, Little was elected to the National Academy of Engineering, and was a fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. Among other honors, the American Marketing Association gave Little its Charles Parlin Award for contributions to the practice of marketing research, in 1979, and its Paul D. Converse Award for lifetime achievement, in 1992. Little was the first president of INFORMS, which honored him with its George E. Kimball Medal. Little was also president of The Institute of Management Sciences (TIMS), and the Operations Research Society of America (ORSA).

An avid jogger, biker, and seafood chef, Little was dedicated to his family. He is predeceased by his wife, Elizabeth, and his two sisters, Margaret and Francis. Little is survived by his children Jack, Sarah, Thomas, and Ruel; eight grandchildren; and two great-grandchildren. Arrangements for a memorial service have been entrusted to the Dee Funeral Home in Concord, Massachusetts.